GnR are rock gods, and the only reason people are voting agaisnt them is becasue of Axl's ego and shitty attitude, which shouldn't even be a thought in this tournament, you should be taking in to factor which band is MORE TALENTED, not which band has the least egotistical frontman, voting against GnR simply cause you think Axl is a dick is just stupid
I disagree with you here, Justin.
The attitude and ego of Axl Rose is absolutely a viable and acceptable argument against Guns N Roses, since along the lines of the longevity criterion, Axl had a HUGE negative effect.
Fact is, had Axl Rose's attitude and BS not derailed GnR, we'd be discussing their chance to win this entire tournament. Sadly, that is not the case. Thanks mainly to Axl's crap, GnR ended before they even exited their first prime.
Bon Jovi, on the other hand, has had about three primes now, with the latest occuring still as we speak. Original lineup and all, because the most important thing was the music.
And Justin, you can get away with accusing Bon Jovi of being a bit soft or watered down (which I expect from you, since you once tried to convince people that Machine Head deserved to advance far in the tournament - you have a slightly higher emphasis placed on the hardness of the music than most fans do), but to say that they sound like shit is ignorance. Musically, Bon Jovi is VERY well put together. It's classic blue collar rock - not as whiney as John Cougar Mellancamp (thank god) and not as mumbly and depressing as Springsteen.
Bon Jovi, along with VERY few bands (such as Aerosmith, Red Hot Chili Peppers, and perhaps Metallica) can say they had more than one prime, or a late rennassaince period. Guns N Roses, once again, wasted the one prime they had. Sure, they made amazing music in that time, but to say that Axl's attitude shouldn't factor in the voting is simply naive.