As has been scripted since at least last year's Royal Rumble, Roman Reigns has won the Royal Rumble.
I knew this was coming a long time and after Mania last year, we all should of known it was Reigns/Lesnar at this years Mania. Lesnar isn't losing unless it's a huge deal and of the young guys, it's been apparent since before last year's Rumble that WWE wanted to make Roman Reigns "look really, really strong."
I just wonder if the reason that Reigns' is the next chosen one is because of how he looks. When they were heading to Mexico, Del Rio was champ, I think they toured UK with Sheamus as champ/headlining, Khali's matches are always the mainevent in India.
WWE is in the business of making money and I think their decision to go so heavy behind Reigns is because of how ethnically ambiguous he appears to be.
He is someone who can be mistaken for arab, pacific islander, hispanic, bi-racial etc. Is this what makes him so valuable to the WWE and a cemented choice for the future of the company?
While the philly crowd may not have liked it, WWE advertised that 170 countries would see this show for the first time and judging from global comments, I think it's safe to assume Reigns is wildly over globally even if the Philly crowd resented him tonight.
As a fan who just wants a good show with the best all-around talent, it's annoying to spotlight the guy who makes the most amount of people worldwide happy, but I'll live with it. Has anyone else noticed this or disagree?
I knew this was coming a long time and after Mania last year, we all should of known it was Reigns/Lesnar at this years Mania. Lesnar isn't losing unless it's a huge deal and of the young guys, it's been apparent since before last year's Rumble that WWE wanted to make Roman Reigns "look really, really strong."
I just wonder if the reason that Reigns' is the next chosen one is because of how he looks. When they were heading to Mexico, Del Rio was champ, I think they toured UK with Sheamus as champ/headlining, Khali's matches are always the mainevent in India.
WWE is in the business of making money and I think their decision to go so heavy behind Reigns is because of how ethnically ambiguous he appears to be.
He is someone who can be mistaken for arab, pacific islander, hispanic, bi-racial etc. Is this what makes him so valuable to the WWE and a cemented choice for the future of the company?
While the philly crowd may not have liked it, WWE advertised that 170 countries would see this show for the first time and judging from global comments, I think it's safe to assume Reigns is wildly over globally even if the Philly crowd resented him tonight.
As a fan who just wants a good show with the best all-around talent, it's annoying to spotlight the guy who makes the most amount of people worldwide happy, but I'll live with it. Has anyone else noticed this or disagree?