In the other Sting thread I said that I didnt think that he was, and I then got a reply from Klunderbunker mentioning Starcade, to which I reply'd that I reckon it was more likely to be Hogan who people paid to see. Which got me thinking that this could be a topic for discussion amongst folk and deserved it's own thread. So as we dont clog up that other one.
Anyway, enough of that bollocks. Normally I dont like to go into the drawing power argument anymore, all that time spent looking up buyrates to prove Hart was better than HBK and all that. Still, I find Sting to be a compelling case, because I can see it from both sides of the fence, but I remain unconvinced of Sting ever being a draw by himself. Popular in his company yeah, but would he have worked without the NWO to go against? I am not so sure. I dont think he was a draw in the same way Stone Cold, The Rock and Hogan were in their top days.
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the subject.
Anyway, enough of that bollocks. Normally I dont like to go into the drawing power argument anymore, all that time spent looking up buyrates to prove Hart was better than HBK and all that. Still, I find Sting to be a compelling case, because I can see it from both sides of the fence, but I remain unconvinced of Sting ever being a draw by himself. Popular in his company yeah, but would he have worked without the NWO to go against? I am not so sure. I dont think he was a draw in the same way Stone Cold, The Rock and Hogan were in their top days.
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the subject.