What the fuck is with some mods?

[GI Cake]

So, what IS allowed here? Everything else. Want to call someone a fucking ****** ass queer ******? You do it here.

There you go, you fucking ****** ass queer ******.

I say that cordially, by the way.

 

[Mr. Artistic guy]

There you go, you fucking ****** ass queer ******.

I say that cordially, by the way.

What are you, some kind of big gay black man gay honky fish assaulting philandering limey prick stain, eat more wanker bitch..

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

I know you probably meant jew, but it could have meant Frankenstein's balls. So now you just invented a Halloween costume.

Hopefully it beats this:

 

[The Butcher]

Please tell me that that's the most incredible coincidence ever.

 

[It's...Baylariat!]

This dude just throws a shit fit for posting a one sentence response and not even gets an infraction for it?

I miss the good ol' days.

 

[It's...Baylariat!]

In the WWE page there was a thread asking what was the best match of the year, so I answer Cena v Cesaro and get a warning off a mod for spam? What the fucking fuck?

Is this place really this shittly moderated than anti Cena mods warn and ban people for liking Cena?

Seems this is a place where the rules are no pornography or anything illegal, this complaint should be valid and remain up, if not it just shows the fucking twat of mod up as being a childish prick with a personal axe to grind. If anyone looks at all my posts (there are not many) they will see I am not here trolling or causing controversy so this mod either has an issue with the fact someone likes Cena or is so drunk on being an internet milk monitor that they throw around their authoritah looking for any excuse to throw their perceived power around.

Was my second warning, but I can understand the first, I put up a video of Mason Ryan at a local house show to let people who may be interested what he is up to now and maybe I should have written a bit more about it, but answering a question is spam? Fuck you mod, eat a fucking dick.

(Not all mods, just this particular jumped up little hitler)

Based on this post, it seems as if you cum inside most of your relatives when you have sex with them, but you keep it under raps to make sure no one figures you for a latent, incest-loving queer.

 

[ABMorales787]

Based on this post, it seems as if you cum inside most of your relatives when you have sex with them, but you keep it under raps to make sure no one figures you for a latent, incest-loving queer.

Back when they complained over a simple response?

 

[It's...Baylariat!]

Back when they complained over a simple response?

?que

 

[It's...Baylariat!]

If you're referring to the previous quote and not the other one, it's referring to the good ol' days of - what seem like educated folks - going all Jihad about receiving a warning for something as opposed to an infraction. It says in the warning that it means nothing and is just a reminder to follow the rules.

Good times.

 

[Rusty]

Y'all geeks.

 

[nightmare]

Please tell me that that's the most incredible coincidence ever.

Don't act like you haven't went hanging around the mall rocking the turtleneck, chain & leather fanny pack combo.

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

A turtle neck and a chain....

No wonder Die Rocky Die.

 

[The Butcher]

Don't act like you haven't went hanging around the mall rocking the turtleneck, chain & leather fanny pack combo.

I'm more of a Zubaz guy.

 

[Dirk]

I'm swinging wild here!

Phrasing! First! Boom!

 

[Cena's Little Helper]

I like your sense of humor, OP. Next time, just add a reason as to why you're choosing that particular match. Here are some examples:

Cena vs. Cesaro [SPAM and infractable]

Cena vs. Cesaro because it was good [NON-SPAM because it includes a reason for your choice].

Cena vs. Cesaro because #$TNP(^F#F [NON-SPAM because it includes a reason, albeit unintelligible, but the mods will probably feel sorry for you since they'll probably think you just had a seizure, but, in your commitment to WZ, found the Post Quick Reply before continuing your convulsions]

Cena vs. Cesaro because I had the best *********ory orgasm ever while this match was on in the background [NON-SPAM...and I'd also seek out every single post you'd ever written and make sure they were all repped]

 

[The Boss]

In the WWE page there was a thread asking what was the best match of the year, so I answer Cena v Cesaro and get a warning off a mod for spam? What the fucking fuck?

Is this place really this shittly moderated than anti Cena mods warn and ban people for liking Cena?

Seems this is a place where the rules are no pornography or anything illegal, this complaint should be valid and remain up, if not it just shows the fucking twat of mod up as being a childish prick with a personal axe to grind. If anyone looks at all my posts (there are not many) they will see I am not here trolling or causing controversy so this mod either has an issue with the fact someone likes Cena or is so drunk on being an internet milk monitor that they throw around their authoritah looking for any excuse to throw their perceived power around.

Was my second warning, but I can understand the first, I put up a video of Mason Ryan at a local house show to let people who may be interested what he is up to now and maybe I should have written a bit more about it, but answering a question is spam? Fuck you mod, eat a fucking dick.

(Not all mods, just this particular jumped up little hitler)

I get the same thing for being a HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN fan. Almost anytime I start a thread they close it right away just because I am a HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN fan.

And it's not just threads. I recently changed my signature to one of Brooke Adams (Tessmacher) and received an infraction claiming that it violated policy. Yet the policy that was quoted by the mod clearly stated that such a violation did not warrant an infraction or even a warning at this time. Total discrimination.

And if WZ is truly trying to present a clean image then they should have strict rules on what kind of language their mods can use. Most of the time some of these guys are just spewing insults left and right and cussing up a storm trying to bait you into saying something to ban you for.

Yeah (some of) the mods on here are less than qualified for the authority..

 

[The Boss]

Don't worry, I used to get warnings all the time for spamming because I am too much of a stone headed, pig ignorant bastard to add a pointless line of "reason" to a self explanatory post. Just carry on the way you are and don't make threads about it, its pointless.

I've been given ONE warning in all the years I have been on here. And that was years ago. But I get several infractions a month and have been banned multiple times. Warnings I could deal with. But this is clearly an abuse of power.

 

[Jane]

Cena vs. Cesaro because it was good [NON-SPAM because it includes a reason for your choice].

Would this actually be considered a non-spam post? I mean saying it was good is sort of implied. Shouldn't a justification for it being good be given?

 

[It's...Baylariat!]

I've been given ONE warning in all the years I have been on here. And that was years ago. But I get several infractions a month and have been banned multiple times. Warnings I could deal with. But this is clearly an abuse of power.

Banned 'multiple' times and you can still post? Consider yourself getting very lenient treatment. If mods ban you numerous times, there's going to come a time where they'll just perma-ban you and save themselves the trouble of dealing with you.

So the only abuse of power here is your power to say really stupid things. Like you being singled out for being a HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN fan.

 

[Lee]

Would this actually be considered a non-spam post? I mean saying it was good is sort of implied. Shouldn't a justification for it being good be given?

The ren you liked the match is it was good.

My favourite old school example of non spam is:

Cena Sucks, he only knows five moves.

 

[nightmare]

Did this guy really dig up a month old thread, just to bitch about the 'abuse of power' thing again?


Wow. You need to evaluate your stress level & medicate accordingly. Take a Xanax or something, brother.

 

[klunderbunker]

I get the same thing for being a HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN fan. Almost anytime I start a thread they close it right away just because I am a HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN fan.

And it's not just threads. I recently changed my signature to one of Brooke Adams (Tessmacher) and received an infraction claiming that it violated policy. Yet the policy that was quoted by the mod clearly stated that such a violation did not warrant an infraction or even a warning at this time. Total discrimination.

And if WZ is truly trying to present a clean image then they should have strict rules on what kind of language their mods can use. Most of the time some of these guys are just spewing insults left and right and cussing up a storm trying to bait you into saying something to ban you for.

Yeah (some of) the mods on here are less than qualified for the authority..

Actually there's another reason.

[youtube]DE3qK0QWv80[/youtube]

 

[Poop Master Flex]

I got caught on it too man to the point I got banned for a month. It's the rules of the forum and although I don't agree but at the end of the day it's their prerogative. It's like going into a person's house where they want you to take off your hat at the dinner table, it's their house therefore it's their call, you either accept it or you leave the table.

 

[The Boss]

Banned 'multiple' times and you can still post? Consider yourself getting very lenient treatment. If mods ban you numerous times, there's going to come a time where they'll just perma-ban you and save themselves the trouble of dealing with you.

So the only abuse of power here is your power to say really stupid things. Like you being singled out for being a HOLLYWOOD HULK HOGAN fan.

I was threatened with yet another banning yesterday and was bombarded with insults in the process. And this wasn't even from one of the mods whom I consider power abusers.

 

[Richard Blonoff]

KB is the worst. I agree.