Search results

I have seen and given Roman Reigns a lot of chances. First, his booking wasn't interesting but now I'm unfortunately not interested in him anymore. I have no interest in seeing what he does now. And it doesn't happen everytime. It takes a lot to completely end my interest. What would I do...

You're welcome. If needed, I'm available for doing this.

Congratulations Dave & Killjoy. And Happy Birthday Killjoy. God bless you.

Thank you, Klunderbunker and Slyfox for everything.

Is it all done? If not, I'm free. I can do at least 2-3 PPV cycles.

I have sent the cycle I was given. If it's right, then I can send more.

I have done one but I ain't sure if it's right or not. Anyone can check?

Your call. Don't worry, I won't insult you. I never said that Wrestlemania main event against Undertaker was planned. I just said how it's obviously a huge push. Revised bro. Except the fact that you didn't read properly what I said. Try and read again. Find me where I said that he didn't...

It's Wrestlemania. Main event. 4 times. Consecutive. That's not a push more than anybody else? Does that negate the huge push of being in the main event for 4 consecutive Wrestlemanias? Well, crowd wanted someone to beat up Reigns. And Braun did it. But crowd still supports Braun. Because...

Thank you for the respect. Because as much as I know, WrestleZone Forums is a forum created to discuss about wrestling. And that's what I'm doing. Seriously? Bullsh*t? Brother, Roman Reigns was in the main event of the last 4 Wrestlemanias. Your opinion may be intelligent and mine may be...

About the match, I just hope that the ones interested in this match aren't disappointed. Make this match more like Wrestlemania 31 instead of the ones that happened this year. At least, put some effort into making people interested in the match. The matches that happened this year weren't...

Why is it so that anyone who questions Roman Reigns' push is termed as Roman Reigns' hater by you? You did it with me numerous times. And now you do it again. And how come you know him so well that he's believing internet and dirt sheets? Is Roman Reigns' push just visible on internet or dirt...

Well we can agree to disagree then. Because I have seen it multiple times. And when Roman Reigns rolls off cage, his right foot goes straight to apron skirt. Never mind. It's okay.

Except that when he rolls off the cage, his right foot goes straight to the apron skirt. Which isn't the floor. He remains there while Brock Lesnar rolls over from the cage to the floor. So, Brock's feet and I should add, BOTH feet touched the floor first. Which makes him the winner. Roman...

It does. Maybe, it doesn't for you. For me it does. Of course. The match video isn't online yet, no? See it. Firstly, I don't hate Reigns. Try understanding it. Secondly, his whole right foot got straight to apron skirt. Including heel. It’s okay if I'm stupid for you. I don't know Jim...

Lol. I don't hate him. Hate is too strong a word. It's okay though. You can believe that I hate him. But I don't. Okay. So the video evidence says that Brock won. And so I believe it. Feel free to call me whatever you like to. I didn't know that a Flat Earther was even a term. Never mind. Now...

WWE using it as storyline doesn't make the truth a lie. And it's not about giving up. I could go on and on. But when someone isn't understanding even on multiple tries, there's no use of continuing to try. I can't force someone to believe something. I will believe what I saw. You can believe...

Nope. I need not try more. I have seen it multiple times and you can too. Feel free to believe what you want to. Try watching it closely. Will help ya.

Why give up? I saw it again. Roman Reigns' right foot was on apron skirt. How's that supposed to be considered floor touch? His left foot touched floor before Brock. But both feet must touch floor to win. Not a single. What to give up now?

Like I said earlier, Roman' one foot touched floor while the other was on apron skirt. Floor. Two feet. To touch. Brock's did. Doesn't justify that it should. If something wrong has happened before, it doesn't justify it.