I think its time we all had a frank talk about one of the most divisive people in the film industry today: Michael Bay. Derided by his critics as one-dimensional and praised by his supporters as one of the best action directors in history. To say hes like Marmite would be both a cliché and inaccurate. He makes Marmite look universally loved.
He has a large portfolio of films as both director and producer, ranging from the Transformers saga to Pearl Harbour. Collectively, his films have grossed over $3 billion. And this is what matters to Bay. He isnt concerned with glowing reviews from critics - hes a populist filmmaker. To him, the film industry is about business and what makes money. His films are almost always high budget and shot in his signature style - thats fast edits and excessive use of special effects. And it seems to work. Look at it this way a Michael Bay film has never made a loss at box office. Hes one of the most bankable directors in Hollywood.
On the flip side, his films are generally regarded as bad. Its that simple. Is that Bays fault? Not necessarily. Sometimes the acting is a problem. Sometimes its the story. Bay is often blamed for Transformers being so god-awful, but maybe the writing plays a bigger factor. In fact, Bay actually called Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen crap and blamed it on the 2007/08 writers strike. Revenge Of The Fallen was unrelenting. It beat you over the head with metal and loud noises for two and a half hours, with no break for the viewer to rest. Is this a directorial flaw or a problem with the writing?
So is Michael Bay a good director? Thats the question. Theres no doubting his aptitude for directing and producing the massive scenes which define his work. Not many directors can handle big sets and big pieces like him. However, that appears to be all he is capable of. Bay has never shown his directorial versatility. Hes never directed that low budget film with a great story. That film which doesnt rely on excessive special effects to be commercially or critically successful. Does versatility make a great director? Thats another question.
So what is Michael Bay? Genius? Overrated? Awful? Is he a great director who knows what his audience wants? Or is he a one-dimensional filmmaker who shamelessly panders to the mass-market?
He has a large portfolio of films as both director and producer, ranging from the Transformers saga to Pearl Harbour. Collectively, his films have grossed over $3 billion. And this is what matters to Bay. He isnt concerned with glowing reviews from critics - hes a populist filmmaker. To him, the film industry is about business and what makes money. His films are almost always high budget and shot in his signature style - thats fast edits and excessive use of special effects. And it seems to work. Look at it this way a Michael Bay film has never made a loss at box office. Hes one of the most bankable directors in Hollywood.
On the flip side, his films are generally regarded as bad. Its that simple. Is that Bays fault? Not necessarily. Sometimes the acting is a problem. Sometimes its the story. Bay is often blamed for Transformers being so god-awful, but maybe the writing plays a bigger factor. In fact, Bay actually called Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen crap and blamed it on the 2007/08 writers strike. Revenge Of The Fallen was unrelenting. It beat you over the head with metal and loud noises for two and a half hours, with no break for the viewer to rest. Is this a directorial flaw or a problem with the writing?
So is Michael Bay a good director? Thats the question. Theres no doubting his aptitude for directing and producing the massive scenes which define his work. Not many directors can handle big sets and big pieces like him. However, that appears to be all he is capable of. Bay has never shown his directorial versatility. Hes never directed that low budget film with a great story. That film which doesnt rely on excessive special effects to be commercially or critically successful. Does versatility make a great director? Thats another question.
So what is Michael Bay? Genius? Overrated? Awful? Is he a great director who knows what his audience wants? Or is he a one-dimensional filmmaker who shamelessly panders to the mass-market?