Whatever way you look at it Cena should go over Goldberg.
If you look at it from the point of view of booking, then Cena is bigger than Goldberg ever was so he's going to go over Goldberg.
I'd
love to see your philosophy on this one. Goldberg went undefeated for how long? He was going over anyone and everyone, and unlike current monsters in WWE, he was beating legit opponents, not Jimmy Wang Yang or Shannon Moore.
If you decide based on wrestling ability then, Cena wins easily.
I'll give you this one. Cena is a better wrestler. But, not even he will get up from a Spear/Jackhammer combo.
If you base your vote on the harder worker then Cena wins easily.
Only because Goldberg's matches were over too quick.
If you base it on who was more entertaining the Cena wins easily.
No. This is perspective only, and in my opinion, Goldberg was more entertaining. His entire entrance, from the locker room to the entrance ramp, lasted twice as long as his matches, yet everyone wanted to see. Like Tyson, he was huge for how quick he could take out his opponents. Unlike Tyson, people still paid $40 a month to watch him do it, and he never had to bite someone's ear off.
If you base your vote on attitude the Cena wins easily.
"Who's next?!"
That's attitude. Not, "You can't see me!". I have a 5 year old son. He says that everytime he closes his eyes when I'm mad at him. It's cute. Not attitude.
If you decide based on physical attributes then Cena would win.
Cena is strong. Goldberg is stronger. There's a reason the Jackhammer was the most feared move for a long time. The FU/Attitude Adjustment/Throwback isn't feared, because the names all suck, and it's a less powerful version of the Jackhammer.
If you decide based on who was the biggest draw then Cena wins.
Goldberg had to go up against a combo of Hogan, Austin, Rock, Triple H, Shawn Michaels, the nWo, DX, Sting...
Cena faces some competition, but he's got the advantage of there being only one top company, and 2 separate shows.
Cena also has home town advantage, which further negates Goldberg's chances.
Goldberg could Jackhammereveryone in the stands, and still win.
The main argument seems to be however that Goldberg should go over Cena because he had a storyline where he went undefeated for a long time, because it somehow gives him credibility.
Please tell me a scenario where Goldberg's booking would be a bad thing. Like I said earlier, he wasn't beating puny cruiserweights.
This is stupid as there are tons of wrestlers throughout history who have had long undefeated runs, sure non as long as Goldberg's,
Thanks for helping my point.
and Goldberg did beat some big stars.
Thanks again.
But be under no illusion Hogan was still the major star in WCW, and if WCW had Cena, then Cena would be the major star.
Did you just say Cena is a bigger star than Hogan?
Anyone who votes for Goldberg is putting far too much emphasis on technicalities, and not looking at who is the better wrestler and therefore the most likely to win.
Aren't the technicalities, what makes him a better wrestler?